In reply to whoosh1 • Mar 1, 2013. 1. If you like to focus close up the 70-200 f4 at 200 mm gives more magnifications than the 70-300 at 300 mm. Adding a 1.4x converter to the 70-200 gives more magnification - close to the legendary 70-180 macro at 180mm. -- hide signature --. Agreed but this is true when using 70-200 2.8 or 70-200 f4 at 120mm f4. When it comes to 24-120 f4, the lens is at its weakest spot at 120mm f4. If you are capturing landscapes using small apertures (f8 to f11 or f16), then 24-120 f4 is the better choice as corner and edge sharpness is weak between 24-45mm on 24-70 2.8g lens. Nikon D750+Nikon 16-35mm f4 VR+Nikon 70-200 F4 VR+Nikon SB700 Tony Lau's gear list: Tony Lau's gear list Nikon Z7 Nikon AP-F 70-300mm F4.5-5.6E Nikon Z 14-30mm F4 Nikon Z 85mm F1.8 Nikon Z 40mm F2 +7 more August 8, 2023, Commack, New York – Tamron announces the development of the 70-180mm F/2.8 Di III VC VXD G2 (Model A065), a fast-aperture telephoto zoom lens for Sony E-mount full-frame mirrorless cameras. The lens is expected to be available in the Fall 2023. The 70-180mm F2.8 G2 marks the further evolution of the first-generation model that Nikon Z 70-180mm VS 70-200mm F2.8 Nikon 600 PF f6.3 vs 600 F4 TC vs 400 F2.8 TC Tuesday, 28 November 2023 04:33. $4800 vs $15500 - Is this a fair fight?? If Nikon made a 24-70 f/4 you'd probably see something similar to what people see in the 70-200mm f4 vs the 70-200mm f/2.8. For what it does, the 24-120mm f/4 is really a very good lens. The VR is excellent. However as others have suggested, if you don't mind carrying two lenses, you might be better off with the 24-85MM VR + the 70-200 f/4 Jan 26, 2016. Asked this question in "Beginners Questions" but did not get any response. Thought would try here as well. Price-wise: Option 1: Nikon 80-400: $2300. Option 2: Nikon 70-200/f4 + 200-500/f5.6: $1400 + $1400 = $2800. So, Option 2 is $500 costlier and buys 10mm on wide end and 100mm extra reach. Also, with Option 2 one has to carry Tamron sells a 70-200 2.8 that's every bit as good as Nikon's 70-200 VRI/II 2.8 and weighs only 400g more than Nikons 70-200 f4 sans tripod collar. If you're fine with the weight while shooting, then you can find better ways to save 400g in your pack (packing less, buying a lighter bag, etc.) .

nikon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8